veganlove:

http://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/12/31/396018/breaking-obama-signs-defense-authorization-bill/

TL;DRThe President’s opponents played the electorate like a fiddle and will get away with it because people don’t seem to realize they’ve been tricked into being angry at the wrong person.

He signed it because if he didn’t, defense spending including benefits to veterans and their families would not have been authorized. The sections of NDAA that many people here seem to have a problem with are sections that were added into the document by primarily Republican legislators and which the President adamantly opposes but was powerless to stop. I’ll repeat that: the parts of this bill that many people here hate were included against the President’s wishes and in a way that he is powerless to stop. The only way he could have stopped these sections from being included would have been to try to veto the bill in its entirety, a move that would have been both political suicide as well as being futile, as Congress would simply have overridden him. He is explicit in his opposition to exactly the parts of the bill everyone here hates, going so far as to detail exactly which sections he opposes and why.
You’ll notice that the bill also restricts his ability to close Guantanamo Bay; this isn’t coincidence. These sections are openly hostile to the President’s stated mandate - they are effectively a giant ‘fuck you’ to the President, as well as a nasty way of eroding the President’s support with his own base. Observe:

1. Draft legislation that is almost guaranteed to piss of the President but more importantly piss of his base.

2. Attach said legislation to another piece of larger, more important legislation like, say, the Defense Spending budget for the entire year so that any attempt to dislodge the offensive legislation will result in a political shitstorm, as well as place the larger legislation in jeopardy.

3. Once attached, begin a PR campaign that highlights the offending legislation and brings it to the attention of as many media outlets as possible - not just the traditional media, but alternative media outlets as well (Fox news, MSNBC, Media Matters, Huff-Po, Infowars, etc.)

4. Here’s where it gets tricky: Simultaneously, speak to both your party’s base and the opposition’s. To your base, argue that the legislation is necessary to ‘Keep America safe’ and that the President, by opposing it, is clearly soft of terrorism and endangering the military by trying to strip the legislation out. At the same time, sit back and watch your opponent’s liberal supporters tear into the offending legislation as being dangerous, anti-democratic, and a threat to civil liberties. You know they will; that’s what they care about most. You’ve designed legislation that will make them froth at the mouth. You don’t even have to keep flogging the message; one look at the legislation will be enough to convince most people that it is anathema to everything they hold dear. Because it is.

5. Pass the ‘parent’ legislation. Doing so forces the President to sign it or attempt to veto it. Since the legislation in question just so happens to be the military’s operating budget, a veto is out of the question. The President must sign the bill, you get the legislation you wanted, but you also practically guarantee that your opponent’s base will be furious at him for passing a bill they see as evil. Even if he tries to explain in detail why he had to sign it and what he hates about it, it won’t matter; ignorance of the American political process, coupled with an almost militant indifference to subtle explanations will almost ensure that most people will only remember that the President passed a bill they hate.

6. Profit. you get the legislation you want, while the President has to contend with a furious base that feels he betrayed them - even though he agrees with their position but simply lacked the legislative tools to stop this from happening. It’s a classic piece of misdirection that needs only two things to work: A lack of principles (or a partisan ideology that is willing to say anything - do anything - to win), and an electorate that is easy to fool.

This is pretty basic political maneuvering and the biggest problem is that it almost always works because most people either don’t know or don’t care how their political system actually functions. The President was saddled with a lose-lose situation where he either seriously harmed American defense policy (political suicide), or passed offensive legislation knowing that it would cost him political capital. To all of you here lamenting that you ever voted for this ‘corporate shill’, congratulations: you are the result the Republicans were hoping for. They get the law they want, they get the weakened Presidential candidate they want. And many of you just don’t seem to see that. You don’t have to like your country’s two-party system, but it pays to be able to understand it so that you can recognize when it’s being used like this.

EDIT: thanks to Reddit user Mauve_Cubedweller for this post

Agreed, that’s the thing with this whole bill, it’s way more complicated than what the alarmists are making it out to be. The NDAA is not a singular “indefinite detainment” bill, that single article is a huge thing that the Republicans got in to put the President’s back against the wall and ensure that he could never close Guantanamo (which is its own fuck off lose-lose situation).

It’s just one of those shitty things where you ask yourself what you would do? No answer you give is free from fucking over lots and lots of people.

-Joe

The proverbial nail on the head.

(Source: le-me-in-a-hat)

1. babyphone-test-2012 reblogged this from stfuconservatives
2. hp-photosmart-c5180-patronen reblogged this from stfuconservatives
3. meghanbee reblogged this from eebnahgem
4. ccounsell reblogged this from caretakerofmyth
5. dontrustlemyjimmies liked this
6. deeperthanbone reblogged this from internetwinnage
7. canon-mp270-patronen reblogged this from stfuconservatives
8. internetwinnage reblogged this from thedarkamethyst
9. rockyhorrorpuppetshow liked this
10. rockyhorrorpuppetshow reblogged this from cwildflower
11. printers-reviews reblogged this from radioinactivity
12. grizzlyjosee reblogged this from amydentata
13. grizzlyjosee liked this
14. telegantmess reblogged this from nezua
15. ephemeralcat reblogged this from amydentata and added:

    Reblogging for commentary. TL;DR: the Republicans in Congress manipulated Obama into passing the ‘indefinite detainment’...

16. organismal reblogged this from amydentata and added:

    I was actually wondering about this the other day. My faith in my president is restored

17. hoky-shit reblogged this from amydentata
18. queerer liked this
19. thedarkamethyst reblogged this from amydentata
20. amydentata reblogged this from flapjackstate
21. meredithmimi liked this
22. flapjackstate reblogged this from tal9000
23. tal9000 reblogged this from thefullmetalbitch and added:

    The big question is that if we hand Congress back to him, will he be able to repeal those provisions? Will he choose to?

24. muninandhugin reblogged this from searchingforknowledge
25. vsthepomegranate reblogged this from nezua and added:

    RE: The Don’t-Blame-President Commentary above: The simple ugly fact is that US citizens have fewer civil rights now...

26. insignificantuser reblogged this from thefullmetalbitch
27. epicinvain liked this
28. mamitah liked this
29. goldbrow liked this
30. tldr liked this
31. searchingforknowledge reblogged this from jhameia
32. jahgoinkstrunk reblogged this from jhameia
33. alwaysonslightlyoff liked this
34. thefullmetalbitch reblogged this from nezua
35. cnufeels liked this
36. heroin-e reblogged this from jhameia
37. xmertz reblogged this from nezua
38. residenthipster reblogged this from jhameia
39. honeyedfire liked this
40. jhameia reblogged this from nezua
41. isabelthespy liked this
42. nezua reblogged this from ultralaser and added:

    Voting or Not-Voting for a President as a means of endorsing or establishing a Way of Life is ridiculous. A President is...

43. ultralaser reblogged this from kungfucarrie and added:

    re-reblogging because people are still blaming obama for this one.

44. new-song-2012 reblogged this from stfuconservatives
45. ashly-gomez reblogged this from epochayur
46. ellipsesificate liked this
47. les-baleines reblogged this from roachpatrol and added:

    This kind of political machination really pisses me off. Is it too much to ask for transparency and honesty in...

48. toogreeneyes reblogged this from youheartsannie and added:

    just because it’s basic political maneuvering doesn’t make it ok, not to mention the fact that the US can’t fucking...

49. tinyfeministkilljoy reblogged this from undyingumbridge
50. Show more notesLoading...